New Publication: Conservation with elevated elephant densities

Nature conservation and restoration in terrestrial ecosystems is often focused on increasing the numbers of megafauna, expecting them to have positive impacts on ecological self-regulation processes and biodiversity. In sub-Saharan Africa, conservation efforts also aspire to protect and enhance biodiversity with particular focus on elephants. However, elephant browsing carries the risk of woody biomass losses. In this context, little is known about how increasing elephant numbers affects carbon stocks in soils, including the subsoils. We hypothesized that (1) increasing numbers of elephants reduce tree biomass, and thus the amount of C stored therein, resulting (2) in a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC). If true, a negative carbon footprint could limit the sustainability of elephant conservation from a global carbon perspective.

Area under study

To test these hypotheses, we selected plots of low, medium, and high elephant densities in two national parks and adjacent conservancies in the Namibian component of the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Area (KAZA), and quantified carbon storage in both woody vegetation and soils (1 m). Analyses were supplemented by the assessment of soil carbon isotopic composition. We found that increasing elephant densities resulted in a loss of tree carbon storage by 6.4 t ha−1. However, and in contrast to our second hypothesis, SOC stocks increased by 4.7 t ha−1 with increasing elephant densities. These higher SOC stocks were mainly found in the topsoil (0–30 cm) and were largely due to the formation of SOC from woody biomass. A second carbon input source into the soils was megaherbivore dung, which contributed with 0.02–0.323 t C ha−1 year−1 to ecosystem carbon storage in the low and high elephant density plots, respectively. Consequently, increasing elephant density does not necessarily lead to a negative C footprint, as soil carbon sequestration and transient C storage in dung almost compensate for losses in tree biomass.

Sandhage-Hofmann, A, Linstädter, A, Kindermann, L, Angombe, S, Amelung, W 2021, ‘Conservation with elevated elephant densities sequesters carbon in soils despite losses of woody biomass’ Global Change Biology, Vol 27, Issue 19, pp 4601- 4614 DOI.

More CRC News

cover for a web post

CRC-TRR 228 Future Rural Africa Awarded Funding for a Third Project Phase (2026-2029) by German Research Foundation (DFG)

We are thrilled to announce that the German Research Foundation (DFG) has awarded the Collaborative Research Centre TRR 228 Future Rural Africa funding for another ...
Read More »
image shows a field in eastern Africa

New Study Reveals How Tanzanian Farmers Navigate Conflicting Sustainability Worlds

Saymore Ngonidzashe Kativu (Project B05 “Science Futures”) argues that smallholder farmers in Mbeya, Tanzania navigate conflicting market-based and eco-cultural ideas of sustainability by creating hybrid farming ...
Read More »
the image shows an industrial area

New Publication: How State Strategies in Special Economic Zones Shape Labor Outcomes in Ethiopia and Zambia

Carolina Kiesel and Peter Dannenberg (Project C01 “Future in Chains”) analyse how different state strategies for developing Special Economic Zones (SEZs) shape labour outcomes. Comparing ...
Read More »
a map showing the location of nyerere dam in Tanzania

Reviving a Ghost Dam: The Politics and Promise of Tanzania’s Rufiji River Basin

In this newly published article, Emma Minja and Detlef Müller-Mahn (Project C03 Green Futures) explore the century-long history and politics of the Stiegler’s Gorge (now ...
Read More »
book cover of a publciation about foot and mouth disease

Rethinking Foot-and-Mouth Disease: How Botswana’s History Challenges Colonial Views of Animal Health

This publication examines how understandings of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Botswana during the 1960s–70s were shaped by colonial and postcolonial contexts, showing how local veterinary ...
Read More »
Scroll to Top