New Publication: Conservation with elevated elephant densities

Nature conservation and restoration in terrestrial ecosystems is often focused on increasing the numbers of megafauna, expecting them to have positive impacts on ecological self-regulation processes and biodiversity. In sub-Saharan Africa, conservation efforts also aspire to protect and enhance biodiversity with particular focus on elephants. However, elephant browsing carries the risk of woody biomass losses. In this context, little is known about how increasing elephant numbers affects carbon stocks in soils, including the subsoils. We hypothesized that (1) increasing numbers of elephants reduce tree biomass, and thus the amount of C stored therein, resulting (2) in a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC). If true, a negative carbon footprint could limit the sustainability of elephant conservation from a global carbon perspective.

Area under study

To test these hypotheses, we selected plots of low, medium, and high elephant densities in two national parks and adjacent conservancies in the Namibian component of the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Area (KAZA), and quantified carbon storage in both woody vegetation and soils (1 m). Analyses were supplemented by the assessment of soil carbon isotopic composition. We found that increasing elephant densities resulted in a loss of tree carbon storage by 6.4 t ha−1. However, and in contrast to our second hypothesis, SOC stocks increased by 4.7 t ha−1 with increasing elephant densities. These higher SOC stocks were mainly found in the topsoil (0–30 cm) and were largely due to the formation of SOC from woody biomass. A second carbon input source into the soils was megaherbivore dung, which contributed with 0.02–0.323 t C ha−1 year−1 to ecosystem carbon storage in the low and high elephant density plots, respectively. Consequently, increasing elephant density does not necessarily lead to a negative C footprint, as soil carbon sequestration and transient C storage in dung almost compensate for losses in tree biomass.

Sandhage-Hofmann, A, Linstädter, A, Kindermann, L, Angombe, S, Amelung, W 2021, ‘Conservation with elevated elephant densities sequesters carbon in soils despite losses of woody biomass’ Global Change Biology, Vol 27, Issue 19, pp 4601- 4614 DOI.

More CRC News

cover for a web post

Call for Applications: Researcher / Senior Researcher Africa Multiple Cluster of Excellence University of Bayreuth

The Africa Multiple Cluster of Excellence is a major collaborative and transcontinental research institution in the field of African Studies. It is comprised of five ...
Read More »
group of people posing for a group picture during a workshop

Workshop: Turning the Illiberal into the Convivial? Debating the Future of Wildlife Conservation in Africa

June 7th – 9th, 2026 | Cape Town Turning the Illiberal into the Convivial? Debating the Future of Wildlife Conservation in Africa This workshop critically ...
Read More »
cover for a web post

Ghost Projects – Ruined Futures and the Unfulfilled Promises of Infrastructure Development: Launch of Special Issue of Third World Quarterly (Online)

Mon | June 15th, 2026 | 16:00 (CEST) Guest-edited by Detlef Müller-Mahn, Eric Kioko and Theo Aalders from our sub-project C03 “Green Futures”, this special ...
Read More »
cover for a web post

Call for Applications: PhD Scholarship – Violent Futures? Contestations Along Carbon Frontiers in East Africa

Our Subproject B03 “Violent Futures” is currently accepting applications for a PhD scholarship position. The project examines how future-oriented carbon credit projects shape social relations ...
Read More »
generic cover for a website post

Hunting, Environmental Change, and the Defaunation of Wildlife in Baringo, Kenya (1840–1977)

Hauke-Peter Vehrs (Project A04 “Future Conservation”) and David Anderson (Project A02 “Past Futures”) argue that the sharp decline of wildlife in Kenya’s Baringo region during ...
Read More »
Scroll to Top